Advertisement
Home | Articles | Blog | Search | News Letter | FAQ's | Links | About Us | Contact Us | Books
Search

Calendar
January 2009 February 2009
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
Week 1 1 2 3
Week 2 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Week 3 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
Week 4 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
Week 5 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
Post New Event Post New Event

Home arrow Blog arrow Is Stammering a Disease?
Is Stammering a Disease?
User Rating: / 0
PoorBest 
Written by John   
Thursday, 05 January 2006
Can a stammer be classed as a disease?

I was reading a recently about whether a stammer is or is not a disease and had a bit of debate with a psychologist about this. According to a medical dictionary a disease and disorders are defined as:

disease (dis·ease) (dĭ-zēz´) [Fr. dès from + aise ease]  any deviation from or interruption of the normal structure or function of a part, organ, or system of the body as manifested by characteristic symptoms and signs; the etiology, pathology, and prognosis may be known or unknown.

disorder (dis·or·der) (dis-or´dər)  a derangement or abnormality of function; a morbid physical or mental state.

It is therefore possible to say that if someone stammers then part of the body would not be functioning correctly. By this rationale a stammer could be classified as a stammer. But then so could damage to the knee. All in all I think the definition of disease is a little lose and also encompasses disorder, though disorder does not encompass disorder. I felt that a stammer was more likely to be a disorder.One site that discusses the debate called boloji writes:

Speech is one of our body's strongest habits and stammered speech is also a habit. Stammering is not a disease and therefore, it cannot be treated through medicines. The stammering child or adult has to be helped to develop a new, more fluent manner of speech through an intensive re-orientation program which focuses on modifying his physical manner of talking as well as changing his mental attitude towards the problem.

Their view is that a stammer is not a disease and the point of being unable to treat a stammer with medicine is certainly valid. I don't know if I see a stammer as a habit, I mean surely if it is a habit then I should be able to train myself out of it. I would therefore class a stammer as a disorder.  Not really convinced on their argument but please let us know you're thoughts.

< Previous   Next >
  I don’t stammer. I do model behaviour. What I am about to say is a generalisation and won’t fit all cases: I think that in most cases stammering is a behaviour not a disease or disorder. A useful way to think of any behaviour is as an emergent phenomenon. What is emergence? Well, if you take a building and consider what went into its construction and use in terms of: idea to build, buying land, getting architect, tradesmen, in getting the thing together and those people and processes involved in making the materials in the first place and the time it takes to build and put it all together at last a house EMERGES. There is no cause - effect. The house that emerges is UTTERLY DIFFERENT than the sum of the ‘parts’, and that is the point. Sometimes the result is ideal but sometimes it isn’t. To carry the metaphor a bit further: repairs and extensions and improvements can be made and this can occur over time. Sometimes a fault may emerge if there is too much of one ingredient or too little. Gardening and cooking or baking are also good ways to think of emergence. Does thinking of stammering in this way affect you view? PM
Posted by PM, on Wednesday, 18 January 2006 at 11:20


 
    1   
Page 1 of 1 ( 1 comments )
 

Add your comments to this article...

Name (required)


E-Mail (required)
Your email will not be displayed on the site - only to our administrator

Homepage


Comment


©2005 MosCom 0.5.8.5j
Privacy Policy | Terms of Use
©Safety in Stumblers 2006